TexasCHLforum.com

chasfm11 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 11, 2022 12:49 pm If this continues, it could end up with a defacto National Carry situation. If State residents cannot be restricted then restricting residents of other States shouldn't pass muster either. Who knows, we might even get the US Army Corps of Engineers rules overturned, too.

I'm about to go on a couple of week trip through "enemy" territory. It would be great not to have to play the FOPA game but we will have a couple of hours of driving time in MD and I won't risk not doing it.

We might get this out of a totally unrelated case. Pay careful attention to the case of the pork producers against California. The argument that California cannot regulate other states farmers is based on SCOTUS rulings that were based on only the federal government regulating interstate commerce. Part of that is where we get the right to interstate travel is enshrined in the Constitution. And at least one legal theory I read is correct, if this right to decision goes correctly, other states cannot regulate my right to interstate travel including my carrying a gun. Of course the article was from a liberal source and claimed some states are trying to write laws forbidding their own citizens from traveling interstate to get abortions. This is how they came to this conclusion.